The delay starts before finance sees the order.
Records locate the wait between delivery confirmation and invoice readiness. Interviews explain the missing handoff.
Human perspective. Operational clarity.
Surface analyses your operational data while AI interviews run across your team. See where people’s accounts agree with the records, where they differ, and what to investigate next.
The connection
The records show where work waits. Your people can explain what happens there. Put both in view, and a useful question starts to emerge.
Listen
The workarounds. The unwritten rules. The reason a handoff keeps coming back. Surface’s AI interviews ask their own follow-up questions, across teams in parallel.
“We spend too much time reconciling the same information across different systems. It slows everything down.”
In practice
Choose a room and follow one investigation from what someone said to what changed. The accounts and records are invented. The method is how Surface works.
01 What people said
“We find out our shifts on WhatsApp the night before. You can’t plan anything.”
02 What the systems recorded
| Sites | Median notice | Late changes |
|---|---|---|
| Site 4 | 2 days | 3 times the rest |
| Site 7 | 2 days | 3 times the rest |
| The other seven | 12 to 16 days | Baseline |
2 days of notice at the two sites whose scores fell
The two sites with the lowest scores are the two whose rotas arrive last. Leavers there ran at twice the rate of the other seven.
Six months of rota publishing times by site, from an export of the scheduling system. Notice is the time between a rota being published and its first shift.
A gap in notice shows where to look. It does not establish the cause on its own.
03 The finding
Finding for reviewSites 4 and 7 sit next to a stadium and are the only two whose targets are revised weekly, against the fixture list. Their rotas follow the target, so they arrive two days ahead.
Ruled outThe managers. Both sites changed manager this year, and so did three sites whose scores held.
04 The decision
Set those two sites’ labour targets from the published fixtures three weeks ahead, and publish their rotas ten days ahead.
An illustrative investigation. People, sites and figures are invented.Go to the room: People and culture
01 What people said
“A freeze doesn’t count for anything. A new member does.”
02 What the systems recorded
| Clubs | Freeze offered | Training done |
|---|---|---|
| 26 on the new-member bonus | 22% | 96% |
| 14 on the older scheme | 49% | 96% |
| Shop visits, two waves | Skipped in 37 of 80 |
22% where the bonus counts only new members, against 49% elsewhere
The gap follows the bonus scheme. Club size, shift and region do not explain it.
Six months of cancellations across all forty clubs, with whether a freeze was offered, from an export of the membership system. Two mystery-shop waves, eighty visits, from the agency’s reports.
The split by bonus scheme is where to look. It does not establish the cause on its own.
03 The finding
Finding for reviewAt the 26 clubs on the new-member bonus, a freeze is offered in 22% of cancellations; at the 14 on the older scheme, 49%. The shop reports show the skipped step. The bonus scheme explains it.
Ruled outTraining. Completion is 96% in both groups, and the gap follows the bonus scheme.
04 The decision
Count a saved membership toward the club target, and put the freeze offer into the cancellation form.
An illustrative investigation. People, clubs and figures are invented.Go to the room: Customer experience
01 What people said
“The delivery is done. Then we spend days chasing the paperwork.”
02 What the systems recorded
| Event | Recorded | Case |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery confirmed | Mon 09:20 | ORD-018 |
| Proof of delivery attached | Wed 14:10 | ORD-018 |
| Invoice ready | Wed 14:35 | ORD-018 |
| Invoice issued | Wed 15:05 | ORD-018 |
53 h between delivery and the paperwork that lets finance invoice
The wait sits before the order is ready to invoice. Once the paperwork arrives, finance invoices within the hour.
One case, traced across the recorded handoff. A time gap shows where to investigate; it does not establish the cause on its own.
03 The finding
Finding for reviewDifferent teams use different completion criteria. An order can be delivered without the information needed to invoice it.
Ruled outFinance capacity. Once the paperwork arrives, the invoice goes out within the hour, at month end too.
04 The decision
Define the fields finance needs at delivery, and name who checks them.
An illustrative investigation. Accounts and records are invented.Go to the room: Operations
The workspace
Move from the question to the process, the supporting evidence and the work that follows. Each part belongs to the same investigation.
InvestigationsOrder to invoice
In reviewRecords locate the wait between delivery confirmation and invoice readiness. Interviews explain the missing handoff.
Next question
Interviews
9 of 10Evidence linked
38Open questions
3Observed process, median time between steps
Look at the time between steps, repeated activity and different paths through the same process.
Decision
Agree the required information, an owner, and what you will compare next quarter.
The rooms
AlsoFor ownersFor consultants and firmsExamplesBeing interviewed?
From understanding to action
Test the explanation against the evidence. Resolve contradictions and make the remaining questions explicit.
Bring the right people into the conversation. Agree what should change, who owns it, and what happens next.
Carry the decision into action. Agree what you will compare next time, using the same definitions.
Fig. 04Evidence into action
Before we begin
Interviews are one source of evidence. In the assisted pilot, Surface also reads the records and documents that go with the question, and connects each finding to the quotes and records behind it and to a decision with an owner.
Owners and leaders who want to see how their business really runs, and the firms who do that work for clients.
Each person chooses how they are quoted, and your company never sees a transcript. The page for people being interviewed sets out the rest.
Start with the records, event history, trackers, documents and policies relevant to your question, alongside people’s experience. The useful analysis depends on the fields, history and definitions available. We can work through those requirements in a conversation.
A question or hypothesis is enough to begin. Evidence may support it, change it or point to a different question. The investigation does not need to end in a predetermined problem or an implementation project.
Each finding points to a decision with an owner. You agree what should change, who owns it, and what you will compare next time, using the same definitions.
The offer
We agree one question about one process with you, interview up to ten of your people by voice or text, read the records that go with it, and take you through a brief that shows the evidence for every finding.
Book a conversationConsultant, assessment firm or CX agency? Work with Surface